Remote Control brings Claude Code to the browser. Amurg brings every agent to every device.
| Feature | Amurg | Remote Control |
|---|---|---|
| Agents supported | Any (8 built-in profiles) | Claude Code only |
| Multi-machine | ✓ | ✗ |
| Team support | ✓ | ✗ |
| Inbound ports required | ✗ | ✗ |
| Permission gates | ✓ | Via Claude Code |
| Audit log | ✓ | ✗ |
| Rich rendering | ✓ | ✓ |
| Voice input | ✓ | ✗ |
| Self-hostable | ✓ | ✗ |
| Open source | Yes (Apache 2.0) | ✗ |
| Pricing | $5/mo or free (self-host) | $100+/mo (Max plan required) |
Credit where it's due: Remote Control uses outbound-only connections, just like Amurg. At the network level, the security model is equivalent — no inbound ports, no exposed endpoints.
The difference is everything else. Remote Control is locked to one agent (Claude Code), one machine per session, and one plan tier ($100+/month for Claude Max). There's no team support, no audit logging, and no way to self-host.
Amurg gives you the same network security with support for any agent, multiple machines, team access, full audit trails, and a price that's 20x lower — or free if you self-host.
The AI agent landscape is moving fast. Claude Code is excellent today, but locking your infrastructure to a single vendor is a bet against the pace of change. New agents ship weekly — Copilot, Codex, Kilo Code, and open-source tools are all improving rapidly.
Amurg is agent-neutral by design. Eight adapter profiles out of the box, plus support for any CLI tool, HTTP service, or custom protocol. When a better agent ships tomorrow, you just add a profile — no infrastructure changes, no new subscriptions.
Same security, more agents, lower cost. Connect your first agent in minutes.
